banner
24 Crestwood
36Bonnie
Battery Page
Chernobyl
Library
Electronics
HurricanMatthew
Logan Alexander
Providence Garage Project
Roof
Tire Page
Topsail Hill
> iacl.org > Chernobyl

Chernobyl

click to expand
The Chernobyl Power Complex (130 km north of Kiev, Ukraine) overlooking an artificial lake ( 22 km2 ) and situated beside the river Pripyat
With GOT Long Night over we move onto something less depressing.

The Chernobyl mini-series.

What I became interested in was the lack of detailing of the electrical end of the operation. Attempting to comprehend the vast complex of plumbing, rods and electrical sub station..

The nature of the test they never really delved into.. Contradictory reports amidst cover-up and lost details..

There are 4 units, apparently all cross wired on busbars to power their own station vs. the assumption the plant ran off the street. Started work in the 1970's the first two units buildings are of an earlier generation than units 3 and 4. Construction on units 5 and 6 was halted a few years after the unit 4 accident.

The culture of unsafe practice refers (in one explanation) to the design as it becomes unstable below 20% thermal output. (Max 3,000 MW) High temperature mitigates the positive void effect. This type of reactor is a light water boiler. The same water water that entered the chamber produces the steam that powers the 2 500 MW (electrical) generators. No heat exchanger. A machine raises and loweres fuel bundles so the reactor could continue operation while being refueled.

Unsafe Electrical practice? Was there an electrical engineer on 3rd shift duty? (Yes and more than one and also some electricians on duty) One of them was looking at an oscilloscope to observe waveforms during the test. The fateful test had been attempted 3 times earlier during the 1980's all unsuccessful. Despite apparently being self-powered the feeling that the event of a total grid dropout wanted some way of running circulating pumps without "leaving the building". What voltage the circulating pumps ran on is still unknown. The fact that during the test the generator was spun-up, then steam to it turned off then the still spinning generator switched into the circulating pumps tells me they were not the same.

Layout There is a reactor hall, which there is a video on, there is a mechanical hall housing turbines attached to 20KV, 50 Hz electrical generators. This power winds up after transformers at 750 KV on it's way to consumers. There is an aerator and de-aerator gallery that separates waster from steam. A vast complex with access and plumbing above and below the reactor core which itself has an upper and lower biological shield.

Other incidents 1991 about 10 weeks before the December meltdown of the Soviet Union, Reactor 3's mechanical room had a generator faulty switch fire ignites the shaft lubricating hydrogen which melts a roof support causing the partial collapse of the roof above the mechanical hall. Reactor 3 was shut down. Gorbachev cited Chernobyl as possibly the reason the Soviet Union collapsed. In early 1980's one of the units had a partial meltdown. Later versions of the RBMK design utilized more control rods as well as higher level (better grade) of enriched (1.8 to 2.0 then ultimately at 2.4 percent) Uranium mitigating the value of the steam-void coefficient.

Nuclear History Videos and lists going back to the 1950's show the development of procedures based on mistakes, fatalities and release of radiation in other countries including United States, Canada and Europe. Soviets just did it better. The Khyztem disaster of the 1950's and associated cover-up the subject of videos and at least one documentary going back some time.

For Chernobyl a list of 60 ish names of plant personnel who were on site including one from the previous shift who took fatal doses. Some died within hours. One body (Valery I. Khodemchuk) was never recovered. The other plants continued to run some years. About 10 RBMK reactors are still running, RBMK refers to the names of the reactor development.

Some feeling during the reading of information provides some in-between the lines feeling for the cultural difference between the design and science and what should have been done as opposed to Soviet cost and corner cutting to meet or rush policy driven production goals.

Short List of references:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_Nuclear_Power_Plant
http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Malko1.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individual_involvement_in_the_Chernobyl_disaster
https://www.oecd-nea.org/rp/chernobyl/c01.html



Home - 24 Crestwood - 36Bonnie - Battery Page - Chernobyl - Library - Electronics - HurricanMatthew - Logan Alexander - Providence Garage Project - Roof - Tire Page - Topsail Hill